CSC Scientific Blog

A blog about test equipment

Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

CSC Scientific Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Surface Tension by duNouy Rings or Wilhelmy Plates – Which to Choose?

  
  
  
  
  

When tempted to think I know all there is about surface tension measurement, further information brings me back to earth. I’m conversant with the principal applications: surfactant analysis, plating, detecting contaminants, development of ink and the like. I have assisted customers to set up and calibrate duNouy Ring tensiometers for most applications -- all the while taking for granted that the Ring technique was the method of choice -- with only infrequent questions arising about Wilhelmy Plate tensiometers.

My lack of concern had a least some justification. The duNouy method has been around for more than 50 years -- twice as long as the Wilhelmy -- and is the most widely used technique. Several ASTM standards call for it.

There are more Ring-style instruments used worldwide than any other type.

CSC Scientific is readying plans to introduce an automatic tensiometer, the manufacturer of which is a strong proponent of the Wilhelmy Plate method. Prudence therefore dictates gaining an education on this technique -- which I'm sharing with you here.duNouy Ring Process

The two tensiometer methods differ in that the duNouy Ring is pulled though the surface to make the measurement, while the Wilhelmy Plate is stationary.

Using the Ring technique, causes a non-equilibrium state in the liquid as the ring is pulled through the surface.

TheWilhelmy Plate Process Wilhelmy Plate, by contrast, is placed at the liquid’s surface and a meniscus is formed on its perimeter, causing a downward pull. The Plate is not in motion thus the entire surface is in equilibrium. The force is constant or varies only with a change in surface tension.

 There are other noteworthy differences regarding applicability of these tensiometer methods.

Measuring surface tension variations over time, (such as measuring time and end-point surface tension for formation of Critical Micelle Concentration of a surfactant) can be made with the Wilhelmy Plate, but not the duNouy Ring. Because high-viscosity liquids cause larger stress on the somewhat fragile ring, the Wilhelmy technique is preferred for these applications.

The Ring method is easier to use on a manual instrument. Although it tends to yield higher surface tension readings, there is a significant body of historical data for the duNouy technique.

Automatic tensiometer evolution has made Automatic TensiometerWilhelmy Plate use easy. These instruments also adapt to the duNouy technique. The automated techniques permit the easy evaluation of the two methods on the same sample, facilitating comparisons of test resuls.

Watch for the announcement of the New Automatic Tensiometer.

Hopefully this short story about duNouy Rings and Wilhelmy Plates has been somewhat informative and helpful.

Until the next time.

Warmest regards,

Art

P.S. If you'd like to discuss your application, call me at 703-876-4030.

Comments

Hi I am going to blog role your blog I like some of your posts. I am mainly writing about surface tension and how it is around us and the potential uses. So Du Nuöy ring and Wilhelmy plate both have their uses for different applications. Like the Wilhelmy plate is usually used for Langmuir Blodgett films whereas the Du Nuöy ring usually made for interfacial tension and measuring CMC. The Du Nuöy ring in my experience is a pain to work with because the ring needs to be free from blemishes. A small bend will change everything and you will have to correct for buoyancy. The plate also made of platinum or the Nima ones are pretty good made of paper. However, a superior technique that was not commercialized until the 1990's is the Du Nuöy Padday method. For surface tension it is great (does not yet work with interfacial tension between two liquids). We have a couple of devices in our lab manufactured by Kibron. It is easy to clean, sensitive yet robust.  
 
Love the post.
Posted @ Monday, March 07, 2011 3:45 PM by christian
Hi Christian, 
 
Thanks for the input. I'm interested in learning more about the duNouy Paddy method. I'll check it out. 
 
I'm also fascinated by Nima plate of paper. Where can I find out about them? 
 
Warmest regards, 
 
Art
Posted @ Tuesday, March 08, 2011 4:51 PM by Art Gatenby
Nice blog post! One question: where can i find a higher relution version of the image you posted about the du Nouy ring method?
Posted @ Monday, November 21, 2011 4:38 PM by Night
Thanks for your answer. I see ... so can i ask you if you have taken that picture from a textbook or a scientific article? If so it would be really usefull for me to know the name of that article/book in order to read it. Thanks in adnvace :-)
Posted @ Wednesday, November 23, 2011 6:47 AM by Night
Thanks anyway for trying to find it out :-) You have been really polite.
Posted @ Tuesday, November 29, 2011 5:32 PM by Night
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

CSC Scientific Company, Inc
2799-C Merrilee Drive
Fairfax VA, 22031
800-621-4778
703-280-5142 (fax)
csc@cscscientific.com
Credit Cards CSC Accepts
No part of this page or any other page in this site may be copied or reproduced in any way.